Stopping the Free-for-All
Published: December 13, 2011
The Supreme Court’s decision to review a federal court ruling blocking parts of Arizona’s notorious immigration law is troubling. It is arguably premature to take this case because there is no split among the federal appellate courts over states’ powers to enact such laws.
The court should use this opportunity to clarify the need for uniform laws in this area of vital national interest and stop the march of states taking immigration policy into their own hands. The Obama administration sued to stop Arizona — and later Utah, Alabama and South Carolina — because immigration is a federal responsibility that states cannot usurp.
Read the full story here: The New York Times
- The Nation’s Cruelest Immigration Law – NYTimes.com (wpvins.wordpress.com)
- Supreme Court Will Review Arizona Immigration Law (alternet.org)
- Supremes to consider Arizona’s immigration law (geneveith.com)