Chief Justice Defends Peers’ Hearing Case on Health Law
By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: December 31, 2011
In the face of a growing controversy over whether two Supreme Court justices should disqualify themselves from the challenge to the 2010 health care overhaul law, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Saturday defended the court’s ethical standards.
The chief justice’s comments came in his annual report on the state of the federal judiciary. In it, he made what amounted to a vigorous defense of Justices Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan, who are facing calls to disqualify themselves from hearing the health care case, which will be argued over three days in late March. He did not, however, mention the justices by name.
“I have complete confidence in the capability of my colleagues to determine when recusal is warranted,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote. “They are jurists of exceptional integrity and experience whose character and fitness have been examined through a rigorous appointment and confirmation process.”
Read the full article here: The New York Times
- Chief Justice Roberts Defends Court’s Impartiality as Health Law Case Looms – Fox News (foxnews.com)
- U.S. Chief Justice Offers Confidence in Recusals – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
- Chief Justice defends colleagues on high court – The Seattle Times (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Chief Justice defends Supreme Court’s recusal policy – USA TODAY (usatoday.com)
- Chief justice defends court’s impartiality (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Chief justice defends court’s impartiality (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Chief justice defends court’s impartiality (sfgate.com)
- Chief justice addresses ethics and recusal questions in year-end report (cnn.com)